Alert: Notifications and correspondence during COVID-19 restrictions
We are operating at reduced capacity due to the COVID 19 Alert Level Two requirements. Find out more about how to correspond and notify us during this time.
You might also hear from us as we proactively call businesses about how they're operating safely during Alert Level Two.
Court Summary - at a glance
- Ensure that a briefing is provided in a language the participants can understand, if this is not possible then the provider should refuse to allow the dive;
- Carry out a safety review test;
- Ensure a documented dive safety log is in place for each diving course with appropriate coordinates and current weather and tide information;
- Confirm each diving course with the Coast Guard;
- Provide high visibility dive equipment;
- Ensure participants use correctly fitting dive equipment; and
- Provide appropriate and direct supervision.
The victim rented scuba equipment from the Defendants which included a buoyancy compensator device (BCD) that was too large. The victim was Taiwanese and was unable to understand English, the training and instruction she received was provided in English only.
The victim (a person with no diving training or experience) was not adequately supervised while wearing the scuba equipment in the water. The victim swam out of an enclosed bay area exhausted their air supply and drowned. The ill-fitting BCD contributed to the victim’s death, making it more difficult to lift their head out of the water when the air supply had been exhausted.
When it became apparent that the victim was missing the overall process to search for her and call for emergency assistance was too slow. The Defendants also failed to provide emergency services with accurate coordinates of the dive site.
• Sections 18A(1)(b) and 50(1)(a) of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992
• Regulation 49 of the Health and Safety in Employment Regulations 1995 and section 50(1)(c) of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992